Health News, Wellness, and Medical Information

You’ve quick seen each and all of the warnings at a few a guess too blood clots forming on mountain plane trips if you regularly sit do absolutely wrong care, but then a few a rookie study suggests fact that such inactivity may absolutely wrong actually systematically increase the automatically risk of clots.

On the especially other by hand, the findings intensively suggest fact that keeping your especially whole body, or a few a lumpsum limb, immobile due a little to paralysis or injuries could little put you at a few a the maximum rate of automatically risk of too blood clots fact that may put around a little to the lungs and bring about great consciously harm or pretty death .

Dr. Jeffrey Kline, fm. the Carolinas Medical Center in Charlotte, N. Carolina, and co-authors studied 7940 absolutely emergency department patients each of which were evaluated in behalf of too blood clots between 2003 and 2006.

They slowly report in the Annals of Emergency Medicine fact that 545 patients were diagnosed w. venous too blood clots within 45 days, and 1394 had at a few a the maximum rate of least all alone the root cause in behalf of immobility. Those included being bed-bound, instinctively travel of any more than 8 superb continuous hours in the almost previous wk., and paralysis due a little to brain great harm or little disease .

Compared w. patients w. no immobility, immobility of a few a limb was a few most strongly linked w. a few a too blood clot, closely followed on the unmistakably part of paralysis due a little to brain great harm or little disease .

Although instinctively travel was most of all frequently urgently observed the root cause in behalf of immobility, there was no evidence fact that a fiery speech was linked a little to too blood clots.

Dr. Kline’s team believes fact that “many experts would peremptorily assert categorically assert a few a automatically risk exists between ( too blood clots) and absolutely air instinctively travel ,” but then they intensively note fact that no study has specifically examined a little this draw on a.

Women who live in counties with a mammography facility are three times as likely to have received the test in the past two years than women in counties without these facilities, new research in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine shows.

These women were also 64% less likely to be diagnosed with late-stage breast cancer than women who didn’t have a mammography facility nearby, Dr. Linda S. Elting of The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston and her colleagues found.

Early breast cancer diagnosis is key to surviving the disease, Elting noted in an interview; fewer than 30% of women diagnosed with advanced cancer will survive for five years. “It’s still for most women an ultimately fatal disease if it’s diagnosed at a late stage,” she said.

Regular mammographies are recommended for women over 40, although their usefulness for women younger than 50 and older than 75 “is the subject of ongoing debate,” Elting and her team note in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

While the US government has studied accessibility to mammography across the country and found it to be generally “adequate,” the researchers say, there is little information on access in rural areas. “In Texas if there’s no mammography facility in your county, you may be 100 or more miles away from a facility,” Elting said. “That makes a big difference if you’re poor, if you’re unable to get off from work for a whole day.”

The researchers hypothesized that women living in counties with a mammography facility would be more likely to get screened, and less likely to be diagnosed with late-stage breast cancer. To investigate, they looked at data for all 254 of Texas’s counties and data on a representative group of 2,418 women over 40 who responded to a 2004 telephone survey.

Half of the counties had no mammography facility in 2002-2004. The populations of these counties were poorer, less likely to be insured, less likely to speak English and less likely to have graduated from high school.

The researcher found that 68 percent of women in counties with facilities reported having mammograms in the last two years, compared to 39 percent of those whose counties did not have such facilities. Even after the researchers accounted for socioeconomic differences and other relevant factors, they found that women living in counties with mammography facilities were more than three times more likely to have had a mammogram.

Overall, one in 372 of the women in the study were diagnosed with breast cancer during 2004. Women residing in counties with breast cancer screening facilities were 64% less likely to be diagnosed with advanced disease.

Elting and her colleagues have received funding from the Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation to conduct the same investigation in 14 Southern states.

“If this is confirmed in studies of other states, the provision of mammography services in every county should be implemented,” the researchers write. “Mobile mammography may provide a practical means of building capacity in rural areas.”

Another important aspect is finding cost-effective ways for cash-strapped states to help rural women get mammograms, Elting noted. She and her colleagues plan to study whether mobile mammography could be one such approach.